Every CMO has been there. You go into a forecast review with your dashboards, coverage ratios, and a solid story about how demand generation is going. The pipeline numbers are up, spending is efficient, and the funnel looks healthy.
But when the quarter ends and revenue falls short, that strong pipeline doesn’t hold up. Deals get delayed, win rates are lower than expected, and sales starts to question the quality of leads. Finance begins to doubt marketing’s credibility. The CMO is left facing the toughest question:
If the pipeline was strong, why didn’t revenue follow?
For years, marketing teams have been taught that more pipeline means more success. More leads, more opportunities, more coverage. Coverage ratios became the numbers CMOs relied on in board meetings. Three times coverage seemed safe, five times looked great, and seven times felt unbeatable.
But the hard truth is that pipeline coverage doesn’t predict results. It’s more of a vanity metric. Pipeline volume doesn’t tell you:
Coverage ratios don’t show their flaws right away. They only fail when it’s too late for marketing to do anything about it.
CMOs aren’t short on data. They’re drowning in it. Campaign performance, lead velocity, attribution models, funnel dashboards, every signal suggests progress. But most of these metrics are backward-looking and siloed.
Marketing is measured by what it creates. Sales is measured by what it closes. Forecasting sits in the middle, stitched together with assumptions. This creates a dangerous blind spot: pipeline quality masquerading as pipeline quantity.
Deals that will never close inflate marketing’s perceived impact. Aging opportunities distort projections. Late-stage stagnation hides behind optimistic stage probabilities. By the time revenue risk becomes visible, the CMO no longer has levers to pull.
Most CMOs are trained to ask:
“Did marketing generate enough pipeline?”
The more important, and far more strategic, questions are harder to confront:
These questions move marketing leaders from just focusing on volume to building real confidence in revenue. Boards care more about confidence than activity.
Forecasting wasn’t made for today’s complex go-to-market strategies. It was built for simpler sales, fewer channels, and slower buying cycles. Now, CMOs work across inbound, outbound, ABM, partners, events, product-led growth, and regional differences, but forecasting still depends on static stages and sales reps’ opinions. The outcome is predictable:
Marketing looks good on dashboards. Sales seems confident in their forecasts. But the actual revenue results still surprise everyone. This isn’t about poor execution; it’s about misreading the signals.
CMOs need to change how they think about pipeline. It’s not just a number at one moment; it’s a living system. The chance of conversion changes as deals move, slow down, speed up, or hit roadblocks. Campaigns affect the pipeline differently across segments and regions. Seasonal trends also impact results in ways static models can’t show.
What matters is not the amount of pipeline today, but how it changes over time. Modern CMOs need forecasts that show what’s really happening, not just what they hope for.
The best marketing teams are moving past pipeline generation as their main goal. Their real key metric is predictability. Predictability answers the questions that CMOs are really measured by:
When you have predictability, the pipeline turns into a tool for growth instead of a risky bet each quarter.
One of the biggest mistakes in go-to-market teams is treating the “marketing pipeline” and “sales pipeline” as separate. Revenue doesn’t care where the pipeline started, and neither do boards.
CMOs who focus only on top-of-funnel metrics lose control over results. The best CMOs demand full-funnel visibility, tracking marketing’s impact all the way to closed deals and beyond. This approach ends the blame game. Marketing, sales, and RevOps all work from the same set of facts, not separate dashboards.
CMOs have good reason to be wary of predictive systems that give numbers without any explanation. Trust comes from understanding, not just accuracy. The predictive tools that CMOs trust most are the ones that:
CMOs aren’t looking for magic; they want clear answers.
Predictive pipeline intelligence changes the way CMOs lead. Marketing shifts from defending past results to shaping what happens next. Budget talks become about making the most of resources, and campaign planning turns into a real revenue strategy, not just a debate over the content calendar.
Most importantly, CMOs get something rare- an early warning.
Early warning gives CMOs leverage. Leverage builds credibility. Credibility leads to influence.
RevSure was built for CMOs who are tired of unexpected revenue results.
Rather than using generic benchmarks or fixed attribution, RevSure uses machine learning models trained for each company’s unique go-to-market approach. The platform looks at hundreds of first-party signals from marketing, sales, and pipeline activity to predict revenue over several quarters.
RevSure’s approach reflects what modern CMOs actually need:
If you’re a CMO who wants to avoid last-minute surprises and start influencing results sooner, check out our recent webinar with Jerry Henry and Francisco Garcia, “Full Funnel Predictability: Leveraging Pipeline Projections.” It takes a closer look at how predictive pipeline intelligence works in real life.
Watch the webinar on demand.
The webinar gives an honest look at why coverage ratios fall short, how predictability changes go-to-market strategies, and what marketing leaders need to do to shift from focusing on pipeline volume to building revenue confidence.

