

Book a Demo
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Every day, GTM teams miss the early markers of buying interest, not because they lack data, but because they’re tracking the wrong indicators. The traditional notion of a “lead” only appears once a prospect fills out a form, clicks a CTA, or responds to an email. These actions are useful, but they are also late. By the time they occur, buying momentum has often been developing for days or weeks across channels, personas, and touchpoints that never materialize inside the lead funnel.
Consider a familiar pattern: a senior stakeholder quietly visits your pricing page twice in the same week. A technical evaluator combs through product documentation. A revenue operations manager spends seven minutes reading a case study. An SDR email gets forwarded to multiple personas inside the same account. None of these actions creates a “lead” in a CRM, but each is a meaningful expression of interest. Together, they form one of the clearest early indicators of buying intent, and yet, most GTM systems never see them.
This is the central shift in modern B2B revenue generation: signals, not leads, are where the pipeline story truly begins. And the companies that learn to detect, interpret, and act on signals first will consistently outperform those still optimizing their engine around MQL volume.
For more than a decade, GTM strategies were built on the assumption that increasing lead volume, more form fills, more downloads, and more MQLs would reliably expand the pipeline. It made sense in a world where buying journeys were linear, predictable, and mostly visible. But modern B2B buying patterns have moved in the opposite direction: fragmented, anonymous, multithreaded, and often invisible until late in the cycle.
Independent research validates this shift. Forrester has shown that 60–70% of the B2B buying journey now occurs before a prospect fills out a form, while Gartner reports that typical buying groups involve 6–11 stakeholders. This creates a dynamic where the majority of high-intent interactions occur outside traditional tracking mechanisms. By the time a lead appears in the CRM, the underlying buying activity has already happened, and in many cases, the real opportunity window is already narrowing.
Leads still matter, but they are lagging indicators. Predictable pipeline requires GTM teams to move upstream, to the earliest clusters of behavioral activity that signal emerging commercial intent.
A signal layer serves as the connective tissue between buyer behavior and GTM action. It captures behavioral, product, intent, and engagement signals across the full buyer journey, then unifies them into a real-time understanding of where momentum is forming. Rather than waiting for isolated lead events, a signal layer weaves together patterns across personas, channels, and time.
This approach is fundamentally different from traditional lead scoring. Scoring focuses on surface-level actions: one webinar, one page visit, one email click. A signal layer focuses on the relationship between actions: overlapping engagement across stakeholders, surges in activity within an account, and velocity patterns that indicate rising interest. It is not a new version of scoring or a refinement of marketing automation. It is a new operating layer that sits beneath the funnel and feeds intelligence directly into GTM systems.
Modern buyers distribute their research across dozens of touchpoints, devices, and teams. A purchase decision rarely originates from a single decisive moment; instead, it emerges from a constellation of micro-interactions that collectively reveal intent. These include early-stage research, mid-funnel education, cross-channel movement, and multi-stakeholder engagement. None of these interactions, individually, constitutes a lead. Together, they form a powerful, forward-looking signal stream.
This is why the future of GTM execution depends not on identifying isolated actions but on understanding the shape of engagement: who is interacting, how often, how deeply, and across which personas. When these interactions cluster within the same account or buying group, they signal a meaningful opportunity long before a traditional lead emerges.
Lead-based GTM engines suffer from three structural limitations that modern teams can no longer afford.
The first is visibility. Traditional funnels only capture a narrow slice of the buying journey, the moments when someone willingly converts. Everything that happens before that remains invisible, even though it often contains the most accurate indicators of readiness. A signal layer brings that activity into view, revealing early and mid-funnel momentum that would otherwise go undetected.
The second is response speed. Lead-driven workflows operate after the fact. By the time a lead is created, routed, and actioned, buyer interest may have cooled or shifted. A signal layer surfaces critical moments as they happen, enabling SDRs, AEs, and marketers to engage at the peak of buyer curiosity.
The third is resource alignment. When teams prioritize leads, they focus on what appears active. When they prioritize signals, they focus on what is active. This distinction is profound. Teams using signals align budget, outbound effort, and attention with accounts that exhibit true buying momentum, not the ones that merely filled out a form.
Collecting signals is not difficult; interpreting and activating them is where the value emerges. A strong signal layer transforms raw behavioral data into orchestrated GTM motion. Instead of static lead qualification, teams operate on a dynamic, real-time understanding of engagement velocity.
Signal activation unlocks new possibilities: SDRs can be alerted the moment a buying group shows coordinated activity. Marketers can shift spend mid-quarter to channels or regions generating real momentum. Sales can engage earlier with tailored messaging that aligns with stakeholders' research. Forecasting models improve accuracy by incorporating leading indicators rather than relying solely on historical conversion patterns.
This transition moves GTM organizations from reactive operations to proactive orchestration, collapsing the gap between buyer intent and GTM response.
Building a signal layer requires three critical components working in harmony.

When these elements come together, GTM teams gain a unified intelligence layer that continuously interprets buyer behavior and translates it into coordinated action.
Pipeline is no longer created at the moment a lead is captured; it is shaped by the early indicators that precede that event. GTM teams that operate with visibility into these early signals engage buyers earlier, tailor messaging more effectively, and allocate resources toward the accounts most likely to convert. Forecasts become more accurate because they incorporate momentum, not just historical patterns. Pipeline becomes more predictable because teams are reacting to leading indicators rather than lagging ones.
In a climate of tighter budgets, higher expectations, and longer buying cycles, signals deliver the operational advantage that lead-centric models cannot.
Leads will continue to play a role in GTM, but they can no longer sit at the center of strategy. A signal layer shifts the focus upstream to where intent first takes shape, turning fragmented behavioral data into a coherent, actionable intelligence system. This is how modern teams identify opportunities earlier, act faster, and build repeatable, predictable revenue growth, not by chasing more leads, but by orchestrating around signals.
RevSure’s perspective is clear: the future of GTM belongs to teams that master their signal layer. Let's talk if you are interested.

