The Evolution of B2B Attribution: From Single-Touch to Multi-Touch and Beyond

Accurate attribution is essential, yet many marketers still struggle to measure the full impact of their efforts across multiple channels. While advancements like multi-touch models have improved visibility, significant gaps remain. This blog explores how attribution models have evolved, their limitations, and what’s needed to close the gap between measuring past performance and driving actionable insights. Dive in to understand the next steps in transforming attribution from just measurement to real strategic impact.

Deepinder Singh Dhingra | Founder & CEO
October 17, 2024
·
5
min read

In today's competitive B2B landscape, accurate attribution isn't just a "nice-to-have"—it's a business necessity. Most B2B marketers say they struggle with accurately attributing pipeline and revenue impact across channels. While significant strides have been made with advanced multi-touch attribution models and AI-powered insights, critical gaps persist.

Attribution methodologies have evolved significantly in recent years, providing B2B marketing teams with better tools to measure the impact of their efforts. However, even with these advancements, they still fall short of addressing all the challenges in today’s dynamic, multi-channel buyer environment.

Siloed data, misaligned sales and marketing metrics, and the complexity of long B2B sales cycles are preventing companies from truly understanding what drives buyer behavior. So, how far have we come—and how much further do we need to go? Let's understand that in this blog.

Multi-Touch Attribution: A More Detailed View, But Still Incomplete

A major advancement in attribution is the adoption of multi-touch models like U-shaped and W-shaped attribution. These models recognize that multiple touchpoints contribute to a buyer’s journey, allowing marketers to get a more comprehensive view of the customer lifecycle compared to single-touch models, which credit only the first or last interaction. Different models distribute credit in various ways, with each one offering a unique perspective on how interactions contribute to conversion. Here are the key models:

1. U-Shaped Attribution

  • Credit Distribution: 40% of the credit goes to the first touch (the first interaction with the prospect), 40% goes to the lead conversion touch (the point when the prospect converts into a lead), and the remaining 20% is split between all other touchpoints in between.
  • Focus: This model emphasizes the importance of the first and lead conversion touches while still recognizing the other interactions in the journey.

2. W-Shaped Attribution

  • Credit Distribution: 30% goes to the first touch, 30% to the lead conversion touch, and 30% to the opportunity creation touchpoint (when the prospect becomes a qualified opportunity). The remaining 10% is spread across the other interactions.
  • Focus: This model highlights three key conversion points in the buyer's journey, giving substantial credit to initial engagement, lead conversion, and the point at which the opportunity is created.

3. Linear Attribution

  • Credit Distribution: The credit is evenly distributed across all touchpoints in the buyer’s journey.
  • Focus: This model provides a balanced view by assigning equal importance to every interaction, from first to last.

4. Time Decay Attribution

  • Credit Distribution: More credit is assigned to touchpoints that are closer to the conversion. The further back a touchpoint is in time, the less credit it receives.
  • Focus: This model emphasizes the impact of touchpoints that happen closer to the time of conversion.

Each model provides different insights, and the choice of model depends on a company’s sales cycle, marketing strategy, and the complexity of the buyer’s journey. While multi-touch attribution offers a broader perspective, it still falls short of capturing the full complexity of the B2B buying process. Today’s buyer journey is nonlinear, often involving multiple stakeholders, cross-functional touchpoints, and a combination of online and offline interactions. Multi-touch models still struggle to account for the true influence of each touchpoint, leaving marketers without a fully integrated understanding of how all efforts drive conversions.

From Leads to Closed-Won: Strengthening Accountability, But Actionability Still Lacking

Recent advancements have extended attribution from simply tracking leads and Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs) to measuring marketing’s contribution to pipeline generation and closed-won deals. This expanded focus has helped provide a stronger link between marketing activities and actual sales outcomes, increasing accountability for marketing’s role in driving revenue.

While this progression offers clearer visibility into the revenue impact of marketing efforts, it does not always translate into actionable insights. Knowing that a marketing initiative contributed to pipeline growth or closed-won deals is useful, but teams need to understand "why" and "how" to refine their strategies. Without this clarity, marketing efforts risk becoming reactive rather than proactive, hampering continuous improvement and optimization.

Granular Content Insights: A Step Toward Understanding, But Lacking Integration

Another recent improvement in attribution is the ability to measure content and asset performance at a more granular level. This allows marketing teams to assess which specific pieces of content drive engagement, and conversions, or move prospects along the funnel. As content continues to play a critical role in the buyer journey, this detailed analysis is valuable.

However, this level of granularity is often siloed and not integrated into a broader, holistic attribution framework. Content’s impact should be considered in conjunction with other marketing and sales efforts across the funnel. Without this integration, the insights gathered from content performance can only provide a fragmented view of its role in the larger buyer journey.

The Gaps That Still Need to Be Addressed

Despite these advancements, significant gaps remain in attribution’s ability to provide comprehensive, actionable insights that drive real, strategic change. Many B2B marketing teams still struggle to move beyond basic measurement and into a space where attribution can inform decisions about how to allocate resources, optimize campaigns, and align marketing and sales efforts.

Modern marketing teams require an attribution model that doesn’t just measure the past but also provides clear, actionable insights to inform future strategies. We need models that account for the complexity of today’s hybrid marketing environments, incorporate both digital and offline interactions, and offer a complete view of the customer journey.

The Path Forward: Transforming Attribution from Measurement to Actionability

To truly capitalize on the potential of attribution, B2B companies need an integrated, advanced approach that connects the dots between marketing and sales, across all channels and touchpoints. It’s not enough to simply track performance; we need systems that provide the insights necessary to make real-time decisions, optimize investments, and continually drive improvements.

In our upcoming posts in "The Future of B2B Attribution" video series, we’ll dive deeper into what’s needed to close these gaps and build an attribution model that empowers teams to take action. We’ll explore advanced methodologies that provide a full-funnel view, support sales and marketing alignment, and deliver insights that guide more effective strategies.

For a deeper dive into these topics, be sure to download our ebook on "The Future of B2B Attribution".

No more random acts of marketing.

Pipeline & Revenue Predictions, Attribution and Funnel Intelligence in one place.
You Might Also Like