

Book a Demo
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Agentic AI is no longer a futuristic concept—it’s rapidly becoming a strategic asset in modern go-to-market (GTM) operations. From autonomous lead prioritization to AI-driven campaign orchestration, agentic tools promise to take the burden of execution off human teams while driving precision, efficiency, and scale.
But amid the hype, B2B leaders are faced with a critical challenge: How do you evaluate which agentic AI tools are truly ready to be embedded in your GTM stack—and which are just automation in disguise?
This blog will walk you through a practical evaluation framework for selecting agentic AI solutions that can deliver real impact across marketing, sales, and RevOps.
Unlike traditional AI, which offers predictive insights or automation for narrow tasks, agentic AI refers to autonomous systems capable of making decisions, taking actions, and learning from feedback in dynamic environments. In the GTM context, these AI agents can:
Agentic AI is particularly powerful for GTM teams that are overwhelmed by data, fragmented tools, and the need for faster, more adaptive execution.
Here’s a structured framework to help GTM leaders assess agentic AI tools:
Ask: Can this tool act independently based on data signals, or does it still require manual prompting?
Look for:
Red flag: If the tool merely surfaces recommendations but needs someone to act on them, it's not truly agentic.
Ask: Does the tool understand the full GTM context—including funnel stages, personas, ICPs, and buying signals?
Look for:
Red flag: Tools that operate in silos or don’t personalize actions based on GTM data models.
Ask: Can the tool explain why it took an action or recommended a change?
Look for:
Red flag: “Black box” systems that leave your team guessing.
Ask: Can the agent work alongside human teams—or does it force a hands-off approach?
Look for:
Red flag: Systems that either demand full control or add friction instead of reducing it.
Ask: Does the tool solve multiple GTM problems—or is it hyper-specific to one narrow task?
Look for:
Red flag: AI tools that only handle isolated use cases like email sequencing or calendar scheduling.
Ask: How does the tool handle data privacy and enterprise governance?
Look for:
Red flag: Tools with limited auditability or unmanaged AI actions in regulated environments.
Ask: What outcomes can the agentic AI drive, and how are they tracked?
Look for:
Red flag: Vague promises of "productivity gains" without measurable impact.
Before making a purchase decision, ask for a limited sandbox environment or pilot program. Assign the AI agent a real-world task—such as optimizing campaign spend or identifying high-intent accounts—and evaluate:
Trust is built in the field, not in the sales deck.
Let’s say you’re evaluating RevSure’s Gen AI Copilot – Reli Assist, which serves as an agentic assistant across your GTM stack. Here’s how it might stack up:
Agentic AI isn’t just another tool in the GTM tech stack—it’s a new layer of intelligence and execution. But like any strategic investment, the value lies not in the promise, but in the performance.
By applying a structured evaluation framework, B2B leaders can cut through the noise, spot real agentic capabilities, and confidently choose AI tools that elevate execution, alignment, and revenue.
Ready to future-proof your GTM stack with agentic AI? Start by asking: What can your AI actually do—on its own?

